36 Questions to Fall in Love
The famous 36 questions to fall in love came from a real psychology study, but the research never claimed to manufacture love. Here are all 36 questions, how the 45-minute protocol actually worked, what it measured, and why the famous four minutes of eye contact are usually attributed to the wrong experiment.
The 36 Questions to Fall in Love: What the Study Actually Said
The 36 questions to fall in love are often presented as a simple experiment: two strangers ask each other the same increasingly personal questions, then look into each other’s eyes for four minutes. And, supposedly, love follows.
The list is real. So is the scientific study behind it. But that is not what Arthur Aron’s research demonstrated.
The protocol published in 1997 was designed to quickly create a feeling of closeness between two people, then measure that closeness. It did not measure whether they fell in love, whether they were romantically compatible, or whether a future relationship would last.
There is another detail that is often misreported: the famous four minutes of silent eye contact do not appear among the 36 tasks published by Aron in 1997.
The real story is therefore more interesting than the viral recipe.
Where did the 36 questions really come from?
In 1997, researchers Arthur Aron, Edward Melinat, Elaine Aron, Robert Vallone and Renee Bator published a study in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Its title is revealing: The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness: A Procedure and Some Preliminary Findings.
It was not presented as a way to make someone fall in love. The goal was to experimentally create interpersonal closeness.
Two people were paired and asked to complete a sequence of increasingly personal questions and tasks. The procedure lasted 45 minutes, divided into three sets of twelve prompts, with roughly fifteen minutes for each set. Participants took turns answering.
And that progression is probably more important than any individual question.
The conversation begins with relatively easy subjects: who you would invite to dinner, what your perfect day would look like, whether you would like to be famous. Then come memories, family, death, regrets, what you already appreciate about the other person, and finally a personal problem.
The exercise therefore organises a gradual and reciprocal form of self-disclosure: you reveal something about yourself, the other person does the same, and then the level of intimacy increases.
The phrase “36 questions to fall in love” became widely known almost twenty years later. In January 2015, writer Mandy Len Catron described trying the questions with a man she already knew in the Modern Love column of The New York Times.
Her essay was titled To Fall in Love With Anyone, Do This. It went viral, and an academic experiment about closeness gradually became, in popular culture, a method for “falling in love”.
What the study measured — and what it did not promise
The original study did not simply ask participants: Are you in love? The researchers were mainly interested in how close the two people felt after the interaction.
In the first experiment, 50 pairs were analysed. Participants who completed the progressively more personal tasks reported greater closeness than those who discussed more superficial topics: on the researchers’ combined measure, the average score was 4.06 versus 3.25.
That is a real finding. But it is important to stop exactly where the evidence stops.
The study shows that this kind of structured conversation can quickly increase felt interpersonal closeness. It does not show that 36 questions cause romantic love, that two people are compatible, or that they will remain close months or years later.
The researchers themselves described their goal as creating a temporary feeling of closeness, not establishing a genuine long-term relationship. Another limitation is that the participants were mainly university students from the same academic environment, which is very far from a representative sample of all romantic relationships.
Later research has reused what is often called the Fast Friends procedure. These studies generally support the same underlying mechanism: when two people disclose personal information gradually and reciprocally, they can feel more connected than after ordinary small talk.
The result concerns connection between two people.
It does not prove that love can be manufactured.
The 36 questions to fall in love — Set I: questions 1 to 12
Here are Arthur Aron’s 36 questions, in their original order. The wording is slightly adapted to sound natural in English while preserving the purpose of each task.
The first set is relatively easy to enter into.
If you could invite anyone in the world to dinner, who would you choose?
Would you like to be famous? In what way?
Before calling someone, do you ever rehearse what you are going to say? Why?
What would a perfect day look like for you?
When did you last sing to yourself? And when did you last sing to someone else?
If you could live to 90 and keep either the body or the mind of your 30-year-old self for the final 60 years of your life, which would you choose?
Do you have a private intuition about how you might die?
Name three things the two of you seem to have in common.
What in your life are you most grateful for?
If you could change one thing about the way you were raised, what would it be?
Take four minutes to tell the other person your life story in as much detail as possible.
If you could wake up tomorrow with one new quality or ability, what would you choose?
Question 11 is worth noticing: there really are four minutes in the original protocol. But those four minutes are used to tell your life story, not to stare into the other person’s eyes.
Set II: where it starts to feel uncomfortable
The second set moves further into aspirations, important memories and family relationships.
If a crystal ball could tell you one truth about yourself, your life, your future or anything else, what would you want to know?
Is there something you have dreamed of doing for a long time? Why have you not done it yet?
What is the greatest achievement of your life?
What do you value most in a friendship?
What is your most treasured memory?
What is your most difficult memory?
If you learned that you were going to die in one year, would you change the way you are living now? Why?
What does friendship mean to you?
What role do love and affection play in your life?
Take turns saying something you consider a positive quality in the other person, until you have each named five.
Does your family feel close and warm? Do you think your childhood was happier than most people’s?
How do you feel about your relationship with your mother?
This is where the order begins to matter. Asking a stranger about their most difficult memory five minutes after meeting them is not the same as reaching that question after twenty previous disclosures.
The protocol gradually creates permission to talk about more personal things.
Set III: deliberate vulnerability
The final set asks for more openness. Some questions remain fairly straightforward; others can touch on difficult subjects.
Each of you should make three true statements beginning with “we”. For example: “We are both here feeling…”
Complete this sentence: “I wish I had someone with whom I could share…”
If the two of you were going to become very close, what would the other person need to know about you?
Tell the other person what you genuinely like about them. Be more open than you would normally be with someone you had only recently met.
Describe an embarrassing moment from your life.
When did you last cry in front of another person? And when did you last cry alone?
Tell the other person something else you already appreciate about them.
Is there anything you consider too serious to joke about?
If you were going to die tonight without another chance to speak to anyone, what would you most regret leaving unsaid? Why have you not said it?
Your home is on fire. The people and animals you care about are safe, and you have time to save one possession. What would you choose, and why?
Whose death within your family would affect you most deeply? Why?
Describe a personal problem. Ask the other person how they would approach it. Then ask them what they think you are feeling about that problem.
The final question captures much of what the protocol is doing. Talking about yourself is no longer enough: the other person is asked to try to understand what you are feeling.
That is precisely what separates these 36 questions from an ordinary list of conversation starters.
The four minutes almost everyone attributes to the wrong study
The version that became famous usually ends with one more instruction: look into each other’s eyes for four minutes without speaking.
Today, that step is so closely associated with the 36 questions that it appears to be part of the original protocol. It is not.
The appendix of Arthur Aron’s 1997 paper ends with question 36. Immediately afterwards, the paper moves to the list of questions used for the control condition. There is therefore no hidden 37th task involving prolonged eye contact.
The four minutes became especially famous through Mandy Len Catron’s 2015 essay. After answering the questions, she and the man she was with chose to look into each other’s eyes for four minutes, and that moment later became fused with the scientific experiment in countless retellings.
The idea of prolonged eye contact was not entirely new, however. In 1989, Joan Kellerman, James Lewis and James Laird had asked strangers to maintain mutual eye contact for two minutes. Participants in that condition later reported stronger feelings associated with liking and passionate love.
But this was a separate experiment from Aron’s. And it certainly does not demonstrate that four minutes of eye contact are enough to make two people fall in love.
You can still add four minutes of silence after the 36 questions if the idea appeals to you.
It is a famous extension of the exercise, not the final step of the 1997 protocol.
Who can use the 36 questions — and when are they less relevant?
The original validation mainly involved people who were not already established romantic partners. That is the context for which the evidence is strongest.
This does not mean that the questions become useless after five or fifteen years together. A long-term couple will probably already know some of the answers, but perhaps not all of them.
The interesting question then changes. Instead of asking “Will these questions make us closer?”, you might ask: “Do I still know what my partner would answer today?”
The 36 questions can therefore become a framework for conversation, but they should not become a test. Do not compare your answers with an imaginary standard, and do not treat a personal confession as something that has to be extracted.
In real life, you are completely free to say: “I would rather skip that one.”
Forced vulnerability is not closeness.
What is the 3-6-9 rule in love?
It has nothing to do with Arthur Aron. The expression “3-6-9 rule” is mainly used online as a loose framework for describing different stages of a relationship around the three-, six- and nine-month marks.
Definitions vary depending on the source. It is not a psychological law or a scientifically validated timetable: a relationship does not automatically enter a new phase simply because the ninth month has begun.
What is the 7-7-7 rule for couples?
Again, it is unrelated to the 36 questions. The 7-7-7 rule is a modern relationship-planning idea, often summarised as a date every seven days, a night or weekend away every seven weeks, and a longer trip every seven months.
The idea can be a useful reminder to deliberately make time for a relationship. The intervals themselves are not scientific.
Where and when should you ask the 36 questions?
The original protocol lasted roughly 45 minutes: three sets, with about fifteen minutes for each. In a psychology experiment, that timing mainly ensured that participants followed roughly the same procedure.
At home, there is no reason to use a stopwatch. You can complete all three sets in one evening, or stop after twelve questions and return to the rest another day.
The setting matters more than the exact duration. You need enough time to listen to an answer properly, and a loud restaurant or a table that must be given back in twenty minutes is probably not the easiest place to do it.
At home, during a getaway, or during an evening for two without screens or neighbouring restaurant tables, you can let an answer take three minutes if it deserves three minutes.
Take turns asking the questions and try to answer genuinely. Most importantly, do not turn the list into a job interview: one question may open a conversation that was never planned, and that is probably a good reason not to rush to the next one.
What about 100 interesting questions to ask as a couple?
There is no scientifically established list of 100 questions to fall in love, and increasing the number from 36 to 100 does not automatically make the exercise more effective.
If you want to continue the conversation, however, Aron’s structure provides a useful model: begin with easy memories and preferences, then move gradually towards values, important relationships, future plans, fears and the way each person experiences the relationship.
What makes the 36 questions interesting is therefore probably not the number 36.
It is the architecture.
They begin where an ordinary conversation could begin, then slowly move towards things most people would not ask about five minutes after meeting someone. In less than an hour, they organise something two people may otherwise take weeks or months to do naturally: move from small talk towards a more personal understanding of each other.
You can try all 36 questions. You can even add four minutes of eye contact at the end.
But if something meaningful happens between you, it will not be because question 36 contains some hidden mechanism.
It will be because, for a while, both of you agreed to answer sincerely — and to listen while the other person did the same.
Read also
Continue your editorial journey
Moon Sign: Emotions, Love and Rising Sign
The Moon sign is associated with emotions and emotional needs in astrology. But it becomes more interesting when compared with your Sun and rising sign: what you show on a first date may not be what you need once the door is closed.
How to Write a Love Poem When You're Not a Poet: 5 Steps
Writing a love poem gets harder the moment you start trying to sound poetic. A simpler method is to begin with one real detail, forget forced rhymes, write in prose first and shape it afterwards. Plus 12 original love poems you can use or personalise.
